You Can't Spend Your Way to Growth

The first time I really read our own Google Ads account, I found us paying for people who were already looking for us.

Someone types our name into Google. They know us, and they meant to find us. And there we were, buying a click to send them to the website they were already headed to.

We were renting our own front door back from Google, one visitor at a time.

That was the moment the whole thing cracked open for me. It was never really about Google. It was that our ad spend had never once been asked to prove what it brought back.

— & —

Payroll has to show up for work and inventory has to sell. But the ad budget gets a pass, because it feels like growth even when nothing proves it moved anything.

Here is the logic that should bother you. If spending money simply produced more business, you would just spend your way to the top. Pour in more, get more out, forever.

That is not how it works, and you already know it isn't. Spending has a point where the next dollar stops coming back. The whole game is knowing where that point is, and you cannot know it by feel: you know it with data, or you are guessing with real money.

The paid search on our own name was just the cleanest example of guessing. When you buy ads on your own brand, "Aiken Secure Storage," "Smith Plumbing reviews," you are paying for people who were already typing your name to find you. The click was coming for free, and you added a toll booth in your own driveway.

And this is where it should stop you cold. In 2014 eBay ran one of the largest controlled experiments ever done on this, shutting their branded search ads off across entire regions to watch what happened.

Organic listings recaptured about 99.5% of the clicks, and total purchases barely moved (Blake, Nosko & Tadelis, Econometrica, 2015). The ads were not creating sales. They were charging eBay for sales it was already going to make.

eBay had the data to catch it. Run the same spend without that data and you never see the leak at all.

But branded search is just the symptom that photographs well. The disease is bigger, and it is not a Google problem. It is every channel.

The agency retainer, the Facebook budget, radio spots, the sponsored little-league banner, mailers. All of it gets judged by numbers that live inside the channel, and the revenue gets counted somewhere else, and the two are never laid next to each other.

Your ad platform reports conversions. Your bank reports deposits. A "conversion" might be a form fill, a dead-end phone call, or a lead that never booked.

The platform counts it as a win the second it happens. Whether it turned into money is your problem, in a different system, that nobody reconciled.

So the honest way to hold any spend accountable is not the dashboard. It is a holdout. Turn a channel off in one market, leave it running in another, and watch whether total business actually changed.

Booked, collected revenue is the only number that was ever real, and it works the same whether the spend is Google, a billboard, or a guy in a chicken suit on the corner.

Skip that test and you never learn which half of the budget is working. So you keep paying, because the report is green and turning it off feels like risk.

Which brings this back to what Exit & Equity is actually about. This is not just leaking cash today. It is an asset you have not claimed yet.

New AI tools launch every day. A few will change how you work. The rest will be forgotten by next month.

TLDR AI is the free newsletter that tells you which is which. Every morning, Anthropic and ex-Google engineers pick the new tools, updates, and open source releases worth trying, with a quick note on what each one does and who it's for.

You find the good ones early, without testing all of them.

One email, 5 minutes a day, read by 1.1M+ people. Get tomorrow's picks.

Subscribe for free

Think of your wasted ad spend as buried NOI. Every dollar you are paying to reach customers who were already coming is a dollar that drops straight to the bottom line the moment you stop.

On a business valued at a multiple of earnings, cleaning up marketing waste does not just save that dollar. It raises what the whole company is worth.

So there is a timing question worth answering on purpose. Do you want to capture that upside before you sell, or hand it to the buyer?

Fix it now, and you spend six or twelve months proving a leaner number, and you sell on that stronger figure. Leave it, and you are handing the next owner an easy win you could have booked yourself.

Neither is automatically wrong. But drifting into the second one by accident is how you leave money on the table at the closing table.

You cannot make that call until you know what your marketing is actually buying.

— & —

You cannot hold every channel accountable at once. So don't. Pick your single biggest line of ad spend and make that one prove itself this quarter.

Write down what it is supposed to produce. The outcome that shows up in your bank, like booked jobs, signed leases, paid invoices. Impressions and clicks do not count here. If you cannot name the outcome, that is the finding, and you can stop there.

Connect the spend to the deposit. This is the step that gets skipped. Take what that channel cost you last month and set it next to the customers you can actually trace back to it, all the way to collected revenue. If the channel is Google, its own search terms report will show you the exact queries you paid for, including your own name. If it is an agency or a billboard, you are stitching their report to your bookings by hand. Either way, one number sits next to the other for the first time.

Then run the only test that settles it. Turn the channel off for a few weeks, or off in one location and on in another. Watch total bookings, not the channel's dashboard. If the business holds steady while the spend goes to zero, you just found money. If it drops, the spend was doing real work, and now you know that too.

The tools here are ordinary. A spreadsheet, your bank statement, and whatever report the channel already gives you. What is rare is insisting on connecting the spend to the deposit instead of trusting a report built to flatter it.

The dashboard is built to make you feel good. The holdout is built to tell you the truth. Only one of them should decide next year's budget.

— & —

Take your biggest ad line this week and try to trace it all the way to collected revenue. If you hit a wall partway there, that wall is worth a longer conversation.

If it does, that is the conversation I want to have. Finding the gap between what your systems say you spent and what your business actually got back is the work I do.

Reply "audit" and tell me which channel you couldn't trace. I'll tell you where I'd look next.

— & —

Wealth consists not in having great possessions, but in having few wants.

- Epictetus